
Unpermitted Renovations and Dual Agency: Key Takeaways from Slatkovsky v Machado
A Puslinch century farmhouse looked beautifully renovated. The structural work had no building permit, and no one disclosed it. In Slatkovsky v Machado, the Ontario Superior Court held both the vendors and their double-ending agent liable, awarding the buyers $150,318 and confirming that the owner’s permit duty cannot be passed off to a contractor.
This is a short preview. The article was written by Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP and the full text is on their website.
About Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP
Insurance LawMedical MalpracticePersonal InjuryAppeals
More from Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP
- Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP Ranked Tier 1 in Best Law Firms Canada 2027
- Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP Lawyers Recognized in The Best Lawyers in Canada 2027 Edition
- Paul Cahill to Present on Expert Reports at Osgoode’s Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case
- No Coverage Until a Request Is Made: The Court of Appeal on Fleet Policies and OPCF 21A
- After the Deluge: When Ottawa Basement Flooding Points to Construction Deficiencies