
Kamlu v 2502301 Ontario Inc: Why a Board-Less Corporation Cannot Litigate
In Kamlu v 2502301 Ontario Inc, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed an action as a nullity after the defence discovered the plaintiff corporation had operated for years with no valid board of directors, its sole directing mind an undischarged bankrupt. Justice Chiappetta held that an officer’s authority cannot outlive the board, and that a trustee’s silence is not ratification. A cautionary tale on corporate governance and the capacity to litigate.
This is a short preview. The article was written by Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP and the full text is on their website.
About Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP
Insurance LawMedical MalpracticePersonal InjuryAppeals
More from Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP
- Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP Ranked Tier 1 in Best Law Firms Canada 2027
- Davidson Cahill Morrison LLP Lawyers Recognized in The Best Lawyers in Canada 2027 Edition
- Paul Cahill to Present on Expert Reports at Osgoode’s Anatomy of a Medical Malpractice Case
- No Coverage Until a Request Is Made: The Court of Appeal on Fleet Policies and OPCF 21A
- After the Deluge: When Ottawa Basement Flooding Points to Construction Deficiencies