A&M Canadian Immigration Law CorporationWinnipeg, MB · November 2, 2026Said v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1226: Study Permit Refusal Set Aside After Finding Inadequate Disclosure of Undeclared Representative Concerns in the PFL
The Federal Court granted judicial review of a study permit refusal and inadmissibility finding under s. 40(1)(a) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA). The Court found that the procedural fairness letter (PFL) failed to disclose the specific evidence underlying the Officer’s concern that the Applicant had used an undeclared representative. The Court also held that the Minister’s Delegate’s reasons did not sufficiently explain the basis for the misrepresentation finding, particularly in light of the Applicant’s explanation that a third party had assisted only with payment of...
This is a short preview. The article was written by A&M Canadian Immigration Law Corporation and the full text is on their website.
About A&M Canadian Immigration Law Corporation
Immigration
More from A&M Canadian Immigration Law Corporation
- Case Law Library : October 2026
- Baneh v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1314: Express Entry Refusal Upheld Where Applicant Failed to Provide Evidence of Foreign Work Duties Required Under the National Occupational...
- Guarin v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1321: Federal Court Upheld Refusal to Reconsider Permanent Residence Application Where GCMS Records Showed Additional Document Request Was Sent
- Garg v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1242: Express Entry Refusal Upheld Where Applicant Failed to Establish Genuine Canadian Work Experience
- Baghdadi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2026 FC 1338: Federal Court Sets Aside TRV Refusal for Failure to Consider Family Ties and Evidence of Return to Iran