R. v. Berg: A Criminal Trial Is Not a Credibility Contest — What the Supreme Court’s New Ruling Means for Accused Persons
In June, the Supreme Court of Canada released R. v. Berg, 2026 SCC 21, and every criminal defence lawyer in BC should have it bookmarked. The decision tackles a question I confront constantly in my Vancouver practice: in a trial that comes down to two conflicting accounts — the complainant’s word against the accused’s — how...
This is a short preview. The article was written by Tarnow Criminal Law and the full text is on their website.
About Tarnow Criminal Law
Criminal DefenceCivil Litigation
More from Tarnow Criminal Law
- Reconciling Gladue and Victim Protection: What the Supreme Court’s R. v. Cope Means for Vancouver Criminal Defence
- AI in the courtroom – what not to do
- Twenty-Three Kilograms, Time Served: R v A and the Individualized Sentence
- New Bail Laws in Canada: A Vancouver Criminal Lawyer’s Guide to Bill C-14
- Everything Changed on July 15: Canada’s New Bail Regime Explained