
AI in the courtroom – what not to do
Artificial intelligence is changing how lawyers research, draft, and communicate. Courts are now confronting how it should be used in the most solemn part of a criminal case: sentencing. A recent Arizona decision shows how quickly the technology can cross a line, and why criminal defence counsel must be ready to challenge it.
This is a short preview. The article was written by Tarnow Criminal Law and the full text is on their website.
About Tarnow Criminal Law
Criminal DefenceCivil Litigation
More from Tarnow Criminal Law
- Reconciling Gladue and Victim Protection: What the Supreme Court’s R. v. Cope Means for Vancouver Criminal Defence
- Twenty-Three Kilograms, Time Served: R v A and the Individualized Sentence
- R. v. Berg: A Criminal Trial Is Not a Credibility Contest — What the Supreme Court’s New Ruling Means for Accused Persons
- New Bail Laws in Canada: A Vancouver Criminal Lawyer’s Guide to Bill C-14
- Everything Changed on July 15: Canada’s New Bail Regime Explained