
BC Court Clarifies Notice and Contractor Status: Lessons from Hajdu v. Triple Hair Group Inc.
A startup moved its Chief Business Officer to invoicing during a cash crunch, then argued he was a contractor. The BC Supreme Court found the employment agreement never ended and awarded $102,732.18. What the decision says about status, pay deferrals, startup titles and mitigation.
This is a short preview. The article was written by Achkar Law and the full text is on their website.
More from Achkar Law
- Fired Over Political Posts: Employers Can Learn From Tribunal Ruling
- Crawford v. Stingray Group: Employers Are Entitled to the New Job Offer
- Parks Canada Layoffs, and How It Differs From Mass Layoff in Ontario
- When a New Employment Clause Turns Into a Constructive Dismissal Claim
- Bad Faith Bargaining Can Cost You Your Strikers’ Wages: What Best Theratronics Means for Employers