Rural Collision & Breath-Demand Refusal — Stay of Proceedings
R. v. X.X. – 2025 – 5841 Allegation X.X. was charged with refusing to comply with a breath demand, contrary to section 320.15 of the Criminal Code, following a serious two-vehicle collision on a rural Alberta highway. According to RCMP and witness accounts, X.X. was driving northbound on a highway when his vehicle crossed the centre line and collided head-on …
This is a short preview. The article was written by Sean Fagan Criminal Defence Lawyer and the full text is on their website.
About Sean Fagan Criminal Defence Lawyer
Criminal Defence
More from Sean Fagan Criminal Defence Lawyer
- Swift Current Commercial “Over .08” — Resolved by Traffic Ticket
- Impaired Driving Causing Bodily Harm — Non-Custodial Sentence
- Dangerous Driving Causing Bodily Harm — Resolved by Traffic Ticket
- Alberta Impaired Driving Causing Death — Non-Custodial Sentence
- Cochrane Breath-Demand Refusal — Charges Withdrawn