Gauthier & Mines Criminal LawyersVancouver, BC · August 27, 2026Sexual Assault: Not Guilty After Trial – R. v. M.A.M. (Vancouver)
Charge: Sexual Assault Issue: Whether the Crown could prove our client committed the offence at a four-day trial Result: As a result of Mr. Johnston's cross-examination of the complainant, the court left with a reasonable doubt as to our client's guilt. Not guilty. No jail. No criminal record. The post Sexual Assault: Not Guilty After Trial – R. v. M.A.M. (Vancouver) first appeared on Gauthier & Mines Criminal Lawyers .
This is a short preview. The article was written by Gauthier & Mines Criminal Lawyers and the full text is on their website.
About Gauthier & Mines Criminal Lawyers
Criminal Defence
More from Gauthier & Mines Criminal Lawyers
- Assault (Domestic) & Assault of a Peace Officer: Absolute Discharge. R. v. T.A. (Surrey)
- T. A.
- Driving While Prohibited, Obstruct Police Officer: Fine – R. v. M.J. (Abbotsford)
- Domestic Assault Causing Bodily Harm: Conditional Discharge – R. v. A.J. (Dawson Creek)
- Assault by Choking: Resolved by Peace Bond – R. v. K.H. (Vancouver)