Federal Court clarifies circumstance when Study Permit Refusal can be Procedurally Unfair
For those looking to challenge the decision, a recent Federal Court decision, Akaya v Canada (MCI), 2026 FC 546, provides example of how IRCC can unreasonably refuse a decision, by failing to ask an applicant about credibility concerns prior to making their decision. In Akaya, the Applicant’s study permit was refused with the IRCC officer finding that the Applicant did not have sufficient available finances for their studies.
This is a short preview. The article was written by Battista Migration Law Group and the full text is on their website.
About Battista Migration Law Group
ImmigrationRefugeeLGBTQ+ Immigration
More from Battista Migration Law Group
- Judicial Review: Am I able to Submit New Evidence?
- LMIA Requirements: Low-Wage vs. High-Wage | What Employers Need to Know
- Increasing your CRS Score - Canadian Express Entry
- The Globe and Mail: Scores of asylum claimants warned they may face deportation after immigration law passes
- Calculating Physical Presence in Canada for Canadian Citizenship Applications